Tests and Scans
OverDrive Info Centers
Help & Support Free Help Forums
Forums Home |
The Pit BLOGCurrent MessageFree Software Rules (11/07) The Gateway Blues (09/07) Summer Fire Season (07/07) Planned Obsolescence (02/07) Sony Busted Again (01/07) 1 Video = 100 blogs (12/06) Playing with Fire III (11/06) Playing with Fire II (10/06) Playing with Fire (10/06) Vista: XP Replacement? (09/06) The Need for Speed (08/06) G-Boomers (07/06) Vista - RAM Guzzler (06/06) The Outlook for Outlook (05/06) Fixing Windows Security (04/06) Vista's Dilemma (03/06) The Wild Wild West (01/06) The Pit BLOGDecember 2007The Evolution of Malware
It was a cold day in South Dakota (circa 1990) as I entered the Gateway building. Unlike most days, the hustle and bustle of a rapidly growing computer company were missing, replaced by an eerie still and quietness. The security guard shook his head, and said, "The software download server got hit with a virus." All of production was shut down. That was my first encounter with malware. The first generation of malware was essentially pranks written by clever kids hoping to raise worldwide mischief without getting caught. Most of the malware (viruses and worms) were benign. A person unknowingly would open an email attachment, which would propagate to people in that person's address book. Aside from clogging up all of our email, no harm was really done. Far less often, were the truly malicious malware that would shut down a PC or reformat a hard drive. At Gateway, production purchased an anti virus product called FPROT that would keep us safe for the rest of my time at Gateway. This was the birth of the security industry and the roots of companies such as McAfee and Symantec. As each new prankster wrote a new malware, anti virus companies would quickly respond by updating signature files. The rapid virus detection blocked its ability to propogate. This approach of using signature files to detect malware is called black listing, and was quite effective at deterring malware. Once I left Gateway, a new form of malware came onto the scene. In my view, it was far worse than the pranks of the 90's because it was being motivated by profits and money. Suddenly, our computer screens were being deluged with pop up ads. I saw computers that were getting up to 5-6 pop advertisements per minute. The PC's performance was shot, and no work was possible. Furthermore, the nascent anti virus makers didn't show up for the party. Unfortunately, this conversation was too common.
I personally feel that the anti virus makers dropped the ball, which gave birth to a new industry anti spyware. Companies such as Pest Patrol, Adaware and Spybot were quickly formed to help us deal with the spyware epidemic. Just like their anti virus cousins, they use black list and signature files to combat malware. And now the teenaged pranksters had become adults. They had children and mortgage payments, and hence their malware must generate a paycheck rather than mischief. And boy did they make money! These guys were making money hand over first. Hundreds of millions of profits were being generated by companies such as Gator and Direct Revenue. Gator even had the nerve to try and go public. Thank God that got shot down. Thanks to the efforts of the SEC and Microsoft, today spyware is on the wane. Rare are the PC's with serious spyware infections. Microsoft implemented XP SP 2, which put many of the basic anti spyware features into the operating system and Internet Explorer. Furthermore, the SEC chased down the most egregious spyware offenders. Today Gator has shut down for good. But sadly, there is a new and far more insidious malware. BOTS. Have you ever noticed all the spam we get lately? They are being propagated through BOTS. BOTS infect a computer and lay dormant awaiting instructions. Usually to send out a new SPAM for the day, and sometimes a denial of service attack (essentially a coordinated hit on a specific web site). The new generation of malware writers is now a far cry from the mischief makers of the 90's. These guys are making a killing. Word has it that these guys are making billions of dollars. And tax free at that. If you add up the profits of all the anti virus companies (McAfee, Symantec, et al), the bad guys are winning. And this generation is smart. The old black list techniques of the 90's are almost obsolete. Several recent reports show that leading anti virus solutions effectively block 4/10 malware. That's 40%. What kind of protection is that? Because they are making so much money PHISHING, their technology is evolving rapidly and becoming even harder to detect. We are learning that many of the new bots live for only one day. This means, they infect the PC, do its dirty work and then perish. Now remember the black list approach. First, the malware must be detected in the wild. Second, the malware must be analyzed by the labs, and then all the signature files must be updated. Best case, this process takes 3-4 days. By that time, the malware writers have written several more bots and are laughing all the way to the bank. It's a scary time out there. That's for sure. I hope and pray that one day soon, there will be an alternate anti malware solution. But until that time, we all must be hyper cognizant of the ever evolving face of malware. douchrti: The Pit Blog: "The Evolution of Malware" (Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:15:27 GMT)
Nice article Rob,
Unfortunately until education about computer security is required for users, it wont change. And online security is big business, it only goes where the money is. Bruce: The Pit Blog: "The Evolution of Malware" (Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:20:37 GMT)
Well if getting all these infections, and wasting resources, time and money running multitudes of software, and internet test sites, scanning, scrubbing, watching...................is easier then setting up a machine to use a proper user account then there is a huge, catastrophic flaw in the way the people use computers.
Don't blame software creators for the way the operating system ships, and don't blame the software makers for designing their software to operate the way the Operating system ships. Place the blame where it belongs. The maker of the operating system has created the dummies that are using computers. Blame the operating system for making it difficult for users to use the operating system the way it should be used. But finally and most importantly, blame all the companies that claim to be helping people, blame all the web sites that claim to be helping people, blame all the forum people that claim to be helping people........... But most importantly blame the companies and web sites that are making profits from these people. They make those profits from ignoring the most basic security principles giving bad advice, and then sell sub par products, services and software to the very people they claim to be supposedly helping. My signature applies to many of them. Then there are the ones who not only do understand, but don't care as long as they are making a profit from peoples misfortune. These companies and web sites are more to blame then the malware writers. You see they depend on the bad advice, and lack of proper assistance to make their money. Because simply put if they actually gave good security recommendations, and tools to implement them, rather then software and services to clean up the messes they depend on to make their money, the oil well would dry up for them. The problem of malware won't go away until they take responsibility and stop buying the software and services and start taking proactive measures to combat the real criminals. The ones who are bleeding them by dry selling them garbage. shogan191: The Pit Blog: "The Evolution of Malware" (Sat, 08 Dec 2007 13:24:56 GMT)
Bruce I promise I already knew that was going to be your post. I agree with your post and will add that programers need to keep the general public happy with how it works. Doesn't matter how safe it is if the public doesn't buy it.
Also agree that being "proactive" is the key bb. Being "proactive" is the key. Easy to use and proactive is the key to success. badbinary: The Pit Blog: "The Evolution of Malware" (Sat, 08 Dec 2007 02:02:56 GMT)
amen. people, use proactive measures, not reactive. scanning for viruses and malware is merely reactionary, no matter how proactive you are about scanning and wasting money on these products.
Bruce: The Pit Blog: "The Evolution of Malware" (Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:11:23 GMT)
QUOTE I hope and pray that one day soon, there will be an alternate anti malware solution. There is. It's called a limited user account. Until people get it through their thick heads that running as administrator is worst thing they can do, then the malware writers will have their way. It's that simple really As long as people choose to use computers this way then there is nothing that can stop these things from happening, because when you run as administrator, you are giving the malware writers administrator rights, and they have access to the system. When the user doesn't have administrator rights, then neither does the malware and the infection never happens in the first place. cmunson: The Pit Blog: "The Evolution of Malware" (Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:03:08 GMT)
Rob examines how malware has become increasingly more difficult to combat.
http://www.pcpitstop.com/news/rob/rcheng0712.asp Note: It may take several minutes for new posts to appear here, and only the 20 most recent posts are shown. The complete thread is available on the forums. |
|