ad


* Survey:
Search


How do you find information online and how fast can you find it?
Enter to win $100 by joining in this month's survey!

The World of Processors

Over the past 20+ years, the PC industry has revolved around key innovations in processor technology. Recent years have been marked by the emergence of multi-core processor technology. Today, there are essentially three types of processors currently available for the desktop PC user: single core, dual core, and quad core. The 'core' is the part of the microprocessor that does the work. This is different from computers with multiple processors. Dual or quad core computers only have a single processor, but that processor can have multiple 'cores'. The advantages of multiple cores on a single processor include lower power requirements than multiple processors, less heat generation, which means a simpler cooling system, less complexity (and reduced manufacturing costs) in the motherboard as only a single socket is required, and reduced latencies between the communicating components, which translate directly into more speed. Besides the core, there is the cache area of the processor, which can be thought of as the 'Inbox' where work is temporarily stored while waiting for the processor to get to it. The bigger the cache, the more work that can be stored there and the more work that can be stored there, the less time it takes to get it processed. As you would expect, the amount of work each processor can do over a period of time increases with each additional core.

Some of the current offerings from Intel and AMD are illustrated below:

INTELRELEASE DATEAMD RELEASE DATE
PENTIUM 4 (32 BIT)NOVEMBER 2000
(DISCONTINUED)
ATHLON 64SEPTEMBER 23, 2003
CORE (32 BIT) JANUARY 5, 2006ATHLON 64 FXSEPTEMBER 23, 2003
CORE 2 DUOJULY 27, 2006ATHLON 64 X2JANUARY 8 2005
(QUAD CORE)NOVEMBER 2, 2006(ATHLON X2)JUNE 1, 2007
CENTRINOMARCH 2003TURIONMARCH 10, 2005
XEONMID 2001OPTERONAPRIL 22,2003

On the Intel side we have the Pentium 4, Core, Core 2 Duo, Centrino, and Xeon as the most popular processors currently marketed. The Core 2 Duo also includes the Quad cores and the Extreme Editions. For AMD there is the Athlon 64, Athlon 64 X2, Athlon X2, Athlon FX, Turion, and Opteron.

32 bit vs. 64 bit

With the introduction of the Athlon 64 in September of 2003, AMD brought 64 bit computing to the desktop PC. 32 and 64 bit refer to the size or amount of data that can be processed in one operation. In the simplest of terms, for a large calculation, the 32 bit processor would have to make two transactions for every one the 64 bit processor makes. The speed implications are obvious. Additionally, 64 bit architecture greatly increases the amount of Random Access Memory that can be used during processing.

Today, virtually all new processors produced are 64 bit. Single core, 32 bit processor based systems are still available on the lower end of the price spectrum and remain suitable for less processor-intensive tasks, such as web surfing or email.

Dual core

Along with being 64 bit capable, most current releases are also dual core processors. A dual core processor's ability to perform multiple functions simultaneously can dramatically decrease the processing time necessary for processor-intensive tasks (photo editing, ripping/burning CDs/DVDs, computer gaming). Software applications that can take advantage of this enhanced processing capability have been uncommon, but are now beginning to emerge.

Core (Solo or Duo), Centrino, and Turion are the dual core models developed specifically for the mobile platform. They use less power and generate less heat, thereby being ideal laptop processors. Xeons and Opterons are designed specifically for the server market, although the AMD Opteron has also proven to be a popular and affordable choice for a desktop computer. The Intel Xeons and Centrinos have actually been through several different iterations while maintaining their purposeful names. Although released back in the days of the Pentiums, both are currently using the Core 2 architecture. Only the names remain the same.

Quad Core

Although very little software currently exists to take advantage of four cores, the quad core processor is the undisputed multi-tasking king. For multitasking with multiple processor-intensive tasks, such as video encoding while rendering an image, calculating a spread sheet, running a CAD program, and preparing a slide show, or any other combination of intense multi-tasking, a quad core processor is best equipped to handle the load. AMD, although first to market with a dual core desktop processor, has not yet released a quad core model. The next generation of AMD processors (K-10) is expected be released in late 2007 or early 2008. Early indications suggest that the AMD processor's performance will be very competitive with the Intel series. For now, this leaves Intel unchallenged in the quad core space.

The Future

An 80 core processor currently in development at Intel represents a glimpse into processor technology of the future - dedicated to decreasing computing time by increasing the number of cores working the data. Each core will be relatively simple in design, but dividing the workload among 80 cores will dramatically reduce calculation times.

Coming: What role do clock speeds play? What are the differences between an AMD and an Intel processor?

Join the Discussion
KRAM: The World of Processors (Sat, 04 Aug 2007 23:34:07 GMT)
The prices are not bad for a new dual core cpu. As for an upgrade, yes that will cost you more but you will get more. I went with this upgrade and it wasn't that expensive.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+
MSI K9N Neo Motherboard
MSI GeForce 8500GT 256mb
GSkill DDR2 800mhz 2x1gb Dual Channel Ram
Magnethead: The World of Processors (Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:46:01 GMT)
So as i read that, that means that P4 processors are no longer made? So whatever 2.8/3.0/3.2GHz processors out there are all that's left in the world?

Guess i'm gonna have to go dual core for my new mobo. Makes that price alot more expensive.
chengrob: The World of Processors (Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:38:29 GMT)
Great article on the world of processors.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070723/ap_on_...4ck5l5_pyAE1vAI

At the same time as this development, more and more processing is moving to internet servers and less on the client.
aaronlewis89: The World of Processors (Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:45:06 GMT)
any reference to cell processors?
badbinary: The World of Processors (Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:44:41 GMT)
QUOTE(HarmonyComputing.NM @ 11:56am Tue Jul 17 2007) [snapback]1394760[/snapback]

The inclusion of the VIA processors would have been counterindicated because this article is only concerned with current technology processors. VIA processors were of the Intel PIII generation, and do not currently have greater than single core, 32bit, 2Ghz capability. Yes, they are used in low end machines, but are NOT capable of running Vista with sucess. You must remember that Windows XP is on its way out, and any processor that cannot run Vista will only be available for older operating systems. True, these processors will run Linux very well, but again, the overwhelming choice for Operating Systems is Microsoft, whether we like it or not. Understand also that the future will ONLY contain Multi Core 64bit or higher processors, and low end computers, though necessary, will never be where the money is.

Within 5 years the VIA, and other Intel Archetecture low end processors will disappear, or will be forced to produce multi core processors of their own. These are all CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computing) processors, the other major Processor technology, RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing) is not discussed here, as Microsoft does NOT support that type of processor.


actually, the processors will (and do) run vista just fine, you must be confused. they are very energy efficient, and are well suited to low-end systems. some companies have done very well supplying parts for low-end computers. wherever there is money to be made, the product will be there. in fact, as computers keep going down in price new segments of our population are able to afford computers for the first time. in these emerging markets there is money to be made.

regardless, if you are going to have an article that presumes to be informative and well-researched, then make it informative and well-researched! that's my point.
HarmonyComputing.NM: The World of Processors (Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:43:49 GMT)
QUOTE(brandon @ 12:13pm Tue Jul 17 2007) [snapback]1394804[/snapback]

I think this article sums it up nicely: http://cse.stanford.edu/class/sophomore-co.../risc/risccisc/

Broken link....

True, and the rest of the articles show computing from the RISC perspective. With the 64bit and higher archetectures, the distinction will blur even more.
brandon: The World of Processors (Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:13:59 GMT)
I think this article sums it up nicely: http://cse.stanford.edu/class/sophomore-co.../risc/risccisc/

HarmonyComputing.NM: The World of Processors (Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:07:23 GMT)
QUOTE(brandon @ 11:24am Tue Jul 17 2007) [snapback]1394780[/snapback]

All modern x86 processors are hybrid architectures. They are essentially RISC processors, but the instructions are converted into CISC for the sake of x86 compatibility.

True, but not germane to the majority of readers. The external interface is CISC, so the processor is CISC. There is no current method to access the RISC core. It is true that the hybrid archetecture is the reason that processing speed is not as tightly controlled by clock speed as it used to be. If we could get away from the X86 instruction set, and operate these processors as pure RISC, they would be much faster. It would, however, require re-writing of ALL software, as it would be truely a different platform.
brandon: The World of Processors (Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:24:04 GMT)
QUOTE(HarmonyComputing.NM @ 12:56pm Tue Jul 17 2007) [snapback]1394760[/snapback]

The inclusion of the VIA processors would have been counterindicated because this article is only concerned with current technology processors. VIA processors were of the Intel PIII generation, and do not currently have greater than single core, 32bit, 2Ghz capability. Yes, they are used in low end machines, but are NOT capable of running Vista with sucess. You must remember that Windows XP is on its way out, and any processor that cannot run Vista will only be available for older operating systems. True, these processors will run Linux very well, but again, the overwhelming choice for Operating Systems is Microsoft, whether we like it or not. Understand also that the future will ONLY contain Multi Core 64bit or higher processors, and low end computers, though necessary, will never be where the money is.

Within 5 years the VIA, and other Intel Archetecture low end processors will disappear, or will be forced to produce multi core processors of their own. These are all CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computing) processors, the other major Processor technology, RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing) is not discussed here, as Microsoft does NOT support that type of processor.


All modern x86 processors are hybrid architectures. They are essentially RISC processors, but the instructions are converted into CISC for the sake of x86 compatibility.
HarmonyComputing.NM: The World of Processors (Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:03:32 GMT)
QUOTE(shogan191 @ 4:55am Sun Jul 15 2007) [snapback]1393776[/snapback]


BTW, I'd hate to be the person trying to get anything done on a 400MHz Laptop.


Unfortunately, there are people wuo use those laptops....I have one client who uses, exclusively, I386 and I486 66Mhz or lower processed laptops. This is because Radios haven't kept up with computing technology. Low processing, and communications speeds are still required to function in that venue.
HarmonyComputing.NM: The World of Processors (Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:56:55 GMT)
QUOTE(badbinary @ 1:14pm Fri Jul 13 2007) [snapback]1392998[/snapback]

this completely omits any information about the via processors that are becoming popular for low-end systems.

once again, your research is incomplete. i'm disappointed.

The inclusion of the VIA processors would have been counterindicated because this article is only concerned with current technology processors. VIA processors were of the Intel PIII generation, and do not currently have greater than single core, 32bit, 2Ghz capability. Yes, they are used in low end machines, but are NOT capable of running Vista with sucess. You must remember that Windows XP is on its way out, and any processor that cannot run Vista will only be available for older operating systems. True, these processors will run Linux very well, but again, the overwhelming choice for Operating Systems is Microsoft, whether we like it or not. Understand also that the future will ONLY contain Multi Core 64bit or higher processors, and low end computers, though necessary, will never be where the money is.

Within 5 years the VIA, and other Intel Archetecture low end processors will disappear, or will be forced to produce multi core processors of their own. These are all CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computing) processors, the other major Processor technology, RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing) is not discussed here, as Microsoft does NOT support that type of processor.
shogan191: The World of Processors (Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:41:23 GMT)
Yeah, you are right. The 400 MHz is part of the energy saving feature. http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?...tem+Description It shows the actual processor size further down the list.

Everex site is down I wonder whose processors they use. JK, it's probably intel anyway.
Bruce: The World of Processors (Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:09:55 GMT)
The everex site is down.

400mhz?

Where do you get that spec from?

1.5 ghz is what I read.

My current HP laptop is only a 1.6 ghz and runs just great

As far as the article goes "The Wolrd of Processors" it is misleading.

The world of processors is huge. The article only names two.

That would be akin to saying the world of engines and only mentioning diesel and gasoline because that is what "most people" have.

Perhaps the title should have been The World of AMD/Intel
shogan191: The World of Processors (Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:55:04 GMT)
Hey Bruce. The only links that work are the WalMart links. I also saw the Marketing Hype from 2003 and 2004. I know they say they are in low end laptops and desktops. I still don't see specific products. You know, like HP 5080, Acer 2112. I think the thing is they would like to be considered for desktops and laptops but I still don't see any specific products or Market share. The two laptops seem to be it. I really don't think this qualifies the article as an abomination, or shows that PCPitstop is behind the times in it's recognition of current hardware. I can understand rooting for the underdog though. I know there are cpu applications OTHER than PC applications. I also hope that we end up with more than one or two processor manufacturers to choose from, but so far, for most people reading this article, AMD and Intel are it.

BTW, I'd hate to be the person trying to get anything done on a 400MHz Laptop.

I looked for information on market share but the latest information I could find was for 2005. I don't believe the WalMart items were there then. Even in the latest articles Everex isn't mentioned in the lineup of players. I'm thinking the reason we can't find anything is that there isn't anything to find.
Bruce: The World of Processors (Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:03:15 GMT)
QUOTE(shogan191 @ 11:04pm Sat Jul 14 2007) [snapback]1393666[/snapback]

Ok, well what market share does Transmeta have? I'm not doubting you guys or anything but I keep asking questions about how these proessors compare to AMD and Intel which I am familiar with but I'm not getting any answers. Do transmea and VIA sell enough processors to be considered a force in the retail PC market? I know there are lots of things going on other than normal retail sales but I'm not getting exposed to them. I haven't been in WalMart more than 5 times in my 60 years of life. I don't like WalMart. Where would I buy a computer for my home with a Transmeta processor?

http://investor.transmeta.com/releasedetai...eleaseID=252483
Are you guys sure that the processors you are mentioning are something that the "normal" user comes into contact with in their pc's? I'm just not seeing it.

http://www.transmeta.com/ Maybe if you are considering mobile phones and other devices but I don't think that's what the article is about. This is PC Pitstop not MP Pitstop MP= Mobile Phone


Transmeta processors are in Laptops, tablets, and some budget computers.

http://www.transmeta.com/customers/targetapps.html

http://www.transmeta.com/corporate/pressroom/awards.html

QUOTE
Microprocessors and Computing Mobile Phone Processors
Transmeta's microprocessor IP, LongRun and LongRun2 Technologies are beneficial to microprocessor designs across the spectrum from server, desktop, and mobile applications. Transmeta's proven microprocessor IP, developed in part from our energy-efficient Crusoe and Efficeon microprocessors can provide benefits to other processor families by increasing performance, enabling dynamic translation, and reducing power consumption. LongRun and LongRun2 technologies are an ideal match to Transmeta microprocessor IP and provide additional benefits for these markets.




Again, VIA is also found in these machines also. Everex uses them and can be found in your local Wal Mart.

Hate to break it to you guys, but the great majority of people don't care about performance and will never visit a site that measures performance.

Most go to the local retailer and buy the cheapest thing they can find sitting on the shelf. Most wouldn't know a GPU fro a CPU. They Ooooooo and Aaaaa at the pretty colors on the box

http://www.everex.com/products/nc1501/nc1501.htm

http://www.everex.com/products/nc1502/nc1502.htm

http://www.everex.com/products/nc1503/nc1503.htm

http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5673669

http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5673667
Bruce: The World of Processors (Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:34:44 GMT)
QUOTE(flewpastu @ 12:41am Sun Jul 15 2007) [snapback]1393707[/snapback]

they dont

same thing for their chipsets ,,,,,,, if i was building a budget PC and Top"o"the Line performance was not a Goal i might consider a board using the Via chipset as they are usually priced much lower and i have used them before .......... but for performance and stablility they dont compare either


I have three boards here with VIA chipsets, very stable, never had an issue with a single one of them. Cheap is what they are. Read my post above.
brandon: The World of Processors (Sun, 15 Jul 2007 04:44:54 GMT)
Depends on which Via chipset. Their mini-itx boards can be quite expensive. Of course, nobody said anything about getting into specifics though...
flewpastu: The World of Processors (Sun, 15 Jul 2007 04:41:46 GMT)
QUOTE(shogan191 @ 11:04pm Sat Jul 14 2007) [snapback]1393666[/snapback]

but I keep asking questions about how these proessors compare to AMD and Intel


they dont

same thing for their chipsets ,,,,,,, if i was building a budget PC and Top"o"the Line performance was not a Goal i might consider a board using the Via chipset as they are usually priced much lower and i have used them before .......... but for performance and stablility they dont compare either
shogan191: The World of Processors (Sun, 15 Jul 2007 03:04:55 GMT)
Ok, well what market share does Transmeta have? I'm not doubting you guys or anything but I keep asking questions about how these proessors compare to AMD and Intel which I am familiar with but I'm not getting any answers. Do transmea and VIA sell enough processors to be considered a force in the retail PC market? I know there are lots of things going on other than normal retail sales but I'm not getting exposed to them. I haven't been in WalMart more than 5 times in my 60 years of life. I don't like WalMart. Where would I buy a computer for my home with a Transmeta processor?

http://investor.transmeta.com/releasedetai...eleaseID=252483


Are you guys sure that the processors you are mentioning are something that the "normal" user comes into contact with in their pc's? I'm just not seeing it.

http://www.transmeta.com/ Maybe if you are considering mobile phones and other devices but I don't think that's what the article is about. This is PC Pitstop not MP Pitstop MP= Mobile Phone
Bruce: The World of Processors (Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:27:59 GMT)
VIA processors are not nearly as common as Transmeta processors, and in fact Transmeta processors have been sold in cheap laptops, tablets, and desktops for quite a while now.

The numbers given I believe are from data pcpitsop collects from visitors and can't really be considered a picture of the complete market.

In fact I would say that people using such processors are certainly not interested in testing their speed or performance, because they understand that it speed isn't the purpose of those computers or devices.

I hate to say it, but because I love this place, but it is simply not keeping up with the hardware and software that is available today.


Join the Discussion

Note: It may take several minutes for new posts to appear here, and only the 20 most recent posts are shown. The complete thread is available on the forums.

ad

Home | Our Legal Stuff | Privacy Policy | Press | Our Store | Link to Us

Testimonials | Customer Service | Support PC Pitstop | Printable Page